Today
I attended a panel discussion on environmental lawyering. Panel participants
include Professor Dean Hill Rivkin of The University of Tennessee College of
Law, Stephanie Kodish of the National Parks Conservation Association, Stephanie
Matheny of the Tennessee Clean Water Network, Sam Evans of the Southern Environmental
Law Center, and Mary Cromer of the Appalachian Citizens Law Center. The lawyers discussed various things about
their jobs including: What do you do? Where does your job fit into the greater
scheme of sustainability? Why do you do what you do? What are the rewards and
Challenges? How do science and data fit in? and What animates your work? While these
answers were intriguing, I found the two most interesting things to be the
amount of public interest environmental lawyers and the overall purpose of
public interest environmental lawyers. Currently there are only around 750
public interest environmental lawyers in the United States compared to the
nearly 25,000 corporate lawyers. This statistic means it is incredibly
difficult for public interest environmental lawyers to fight against big business.
Additionally, since there are so few public interest environmental lawyers, the
lawyers have to be extremely selective about the cases they take and cannot
effectively defend the entirety of the public interest. This leads to many
companies getting away with violations against government policies such as the
Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act. Public interest environmental lawyers
can be called the great internalizes. Their work forces companies that pollute
to internalize the costs associated with the external effects of their
pollution. These companies now factor in externalities when making decisions.
Public interest environmental law seems like an interesting and expanding field
for upcoming lawyers.
No comments:
Post a Comment